Advertisement
BBC TopGear
BBC TopGear
Subscribe to Top Gear newsletter
Sign up now for more news, reviews and exclusives from Top Gear.
Subscribe
Hybrid

Myth buster: do you really spend 'half' your time driving in town?

When it comes to measuring fuel economy, time spent in the car isn't the factor...

Published: 16 Jul 2024

Myth: 'I drive mostly in town'

Normal petrol cars get their worst fuel economy in town driving. Hybrids do better there, because they collect energy otherwise wasted when you slow down, then in accelerating can re-use that captured electrical energy instead of burning more petrol. But when speed is roughly constant on faster main roads, hybrid tech does very little to help.

Because of that improvement in urban economy, people say, “half my driving is in town so I should get a hybrid". Usually they’re wrong. Because half the time they spend driving is in town, not half the distance.

Advertisement - Page continues below

Here’s an example – an extreme one but it illustrates the point. On a weekday evening, it’ll take roughly an hour to get from King’s Cross in central London to the southern end of the M1. Then you could drive up the motorway for an hour to Northampton. Simple: an hour each. “Half my driving is in town.”

No it’s not. To the motorway from King’s Cross is seven miles. The motorway section afterward is 63. You’ve done 70 miles. But it was actually 90 per cent motorway, 10 per cent urban. Your fuel consumption will reflect this, as the average will be 90 per cent weighted to the motorway figure.

Many dash displays can give you a graph of the fuel use over the past hour, in say five-minute intervals. They only encourage the fallacy I’m talking about, by overemphasising the periods you’re going almost nowhere and actually using very little fuel. You’d get a more realistic sense of what’s happening if the horizontal scale were distance not time.

Electric cars assume you want more of this info, so they often show a graph of miles per kWh, usually with the same misleading horizontal scale of time not distance.

Advertisement - Page continues below

Anyway, if you did mostly drive in town, you’d be be moving slowly, so would go very few miles in a year. At least unless you were a cabbie or delivery driver and at it full time. If you don’t drive many miles the fuel cost pales beside the finance and insurance.

Time matters when we talk about average speed. It’s distance over time, duh. But it’s completely irrelevant in measurement of fuel economy because that’s distance over volume.

Top Gear
Newsletter

Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.

More from Top Gear

Loading
See more on Hybrid

Subscribe to the Top Gear Newsletter

Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.

By clicking subscribe, you agree to receive news, promotions and offers by email from Top Gear and BBC Studios. Your information will be used in accordance with our privacy policy.

BBC TopGear

Try BBC Top Gear Magazine

subscribe